Use random() instead of rand() to increase portability

Quoting glibc rand(3):

The  versions  of rand() and srand() in the Linux C Library use the same random
number generator as random(3) and srandom(3), so the lower-order bits should be
as  random  as  the  higher-order bits.   However,  on  older  rand()
implementations, and on current implementations on different systems, the
lower-order bits are much less random than the higher-order bits.  Do not use
this function in applications intended to be portable when good randomness is
needed.  (Use random(3) instead.)

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/src/main.c b/src/main.c
index 1a76e2d..779e0bd 100644
--- a/src/main.c
+++ b/src/main.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 {
 	atexit(feh_clean_exit);
 
-	srand(getpid() * time(NULL) % ((unsigned int) -1));
+	srandom(getpid() * time(NULL) % ((unsigned int) -1));
 
 	setup_signal_handlers();
 	init_parse_options(argc, argv);